<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Thumbs up to online chat sessions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.avangate.com/online-chat-sessions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.avangate.com/online-chat-sessions/</link>
	<description>Software Sales Tips &#124; Software Business Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 04:03:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Delia Ene</title>
		<link>http://blog.avangate.com/online-chat-sessions/comment-page-1/#comment-1982</link>
		<dc:creator>Delia Ene</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 14:01:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.avangate.com/?p=802#comment-1982</guid>
		<description>Hmm... Twitter-based online chat. That&#039;s something I haven&#039;t tried (yet)...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm&#8230; Twitter-based online chat. That&#8217;s something I haven&#8217;t tried (yet)&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Cohen</title>
		<link>http://blog.avangate.com/online-chat-sessions/comment-page-1/#comment-1961</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Cohen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 22:11:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.avangate.com/?p=802#comment-1961</guid>
		<description>I too have had good luck with Twitter-based on-line chat, and the (searchable!) history is a great bonus.

It&#039;s also a nice addition to a standard webinar; the participants can talk about things and ask questions without interrupting the presenter or disturbing other people who don&#039;t care to chat.   This works best when a second person monitors Twitter during the presentation so the presenter can weave in answers to questions and otherwise join the discussion.

HOWEVER!  It can become a victim of its own success.  With enough people in the room, you get people talking &quot;over&quot; each other which becomes impossible to grok.  Experienced chatters might be able to follow and continue the pattern; the rest of us are just lost.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I too have had good luck with Twitter-based on-line chat, and the (searchable!) history is a great bonus.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s also a nice addition to a standard webinar; the participants can talk about things and ask questions without interrupting the presenter or disturbing other people who don&#8217;t care to chat.   This works best when a second person monitors Twitter during the presentation so the presenter can weave in answers to questions and otherwise join the discussion.</p>
<p>HOWEVER!  It can become a victim of its own success.  With enough people in the room, you get people talking &#8220;over&#8221; each other which becomes impossible to grok.  Experienced chatters might be able to follow and continue the pattern; the rest of us are just lost.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

